Collaboration
I gave various groups a fair chance. The Zadok Calendar advocates in Israel seemed more focused on selling calendars and cultivating a devoted following than on genuine innovation. That's disappointing. The whole point of a perennial calendar is simplicity and reusability: the same reliable structure every single year, no endless debates or adjustments.
What is it about religious frameworks that so often shuts down critical thinking and practical problem-solving?
In the American Messianic scene—where Facebook groups host endless discussions—people complain about the dozens of competing variations and ongoing fights over intercalation. Yet many haven't even engaged deeply with the Dead Sea Scrolls or primary sources. They resist technology and tools when someone finally builds them, then ostracize the developers. The hypocrisy is exhausting.
That's why GPC remains explicitly secular. We hold this position firmly: this calendar is for serious use—paying bills, scheduling real events, running businesses, and improving daily efficiency. It's not a hobby club or echo chamber for adults. Religious circles rarely adopt it for practical life; it stays theoretical or ceremonial, which is sad.
We launched three apps this month alone, with Google Play as our next major target. If you're serious about collaboration—building tools, integrating features, or expanding adoption—please reach out. But stay clear of religious echo chambers; they won't drive the real-world adoption we need.
For those interested in collaborating on a practical, perennial system, see our advantages page here:
We may eventually set up a dedicated Facebook group or similar space for coordination, but only if it stays focused on utility, innovation, and integrity—not dogma or drama.
Let's build something that actually works for the world.
Comments
Post a Comment